UM  > Faculty of Social Sciences
Residential Collegefalse
Status已發表Published
Change in caregivers’ attitudes and use of corporal punishment following a legal ban: A multi-country longitudinal comparison
Liane Peña Alampay; Jennifer Godwin; Jennifer E. Lansford; Paul Oburu; Marc H. Bornstein; Lei Chang; Kirby Deater-Deckard; W. Andrew Rothenberg; Patrick S. Malone
2021-08
Source PublicationChild Maltreatment
Abstract

We examined whether a policy banning corporal punishment enacted in Kenya in 2010 is associated with changes in Kenyan caregivers’ use of corporal punishment and beliefs in its effectiveness and normativeness, and compared to caregivers in six countries without bans in the same period. Using a longitudinal study with six waves of panel data (2008–2016), mothers (N = 1086) in Colombia, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Philippines, Thailand, and United States reported household use of corporal punishment and beliefs about its effectiveness and normativeness. Random intercept models and multi-group piecewise growth curve
models indicated that the proportion of corporal punishment behaviors used by the Kenyan caregivers decreased post-ban at a significantly different rate compared to the caregivers in other countries in the same period. Beliefs of effectiveness of corporal punishment were declining among the caregivers in all sites, whereas the Kenyan mothers reported increasing perceptions of
normativeness of corporal punishment post-ban, different from the other sites. While other contributing factors cannot be ruled out, our natural experiment suggests that corporal punishment decreased after a national ban, a shift that was not evident in sites without bans in the same period.

KeywordLongitudinal Research Legal Aspects Parenting Child Maltreatment
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionFaculty of Social Sciences
Affiliation1.Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines
2.Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
3.Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
4.Maseno University, Maseno, Nyanza, Kenya
5.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, USA 5
6.Universita di Roma Sapienza Facolta di Psicologia 2, Taipa, Macau, China
7.University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
8.Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
9.Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Liane Peña Alampay,Jennifer Godwin,Jennifer E. Lansford,et al. Change in caregivers’ attitudes and use of corporal punishment following a legal ban: A multi-country longitudinal comparison[J]. Child Maltreatment, 2021.
APA Liane Peña Alampay., Jennifer Godwin., Jennifer E. Lansford., Paul Oburu., Marc H. Bornstein., Lei Chang., Kirby Deater-Deckard., W. Andrew Rothenberg., & Patrick S. Malone (2021). Change in caregivers’ attitudes and use of corporal punishment following a legal ban: A multi-country longitudinal comparison. Child Maltreatment.
MLA Liane Peña Alampay,et al."Change in caregivers’ attitudes and use of corporal punishment following a legal ban: A multi-country longitudinal comparison".Child Maltreatment (2021).
Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/Size Publications Version Access License
11 Change in caregiv(726KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SAView Download
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Liane Peña Alampay]'s Articles
[Jennifer Godwin]'s Articles
[Jennifer E. Lansford]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Liane Peña Alampay]'s Articles
[Jennifer Godwin]'s Articles
[Jennifer E. Lansford]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Liane Peña Alampay]'s Articles
[Jennifer Godwin]'s Articles
[Jennifer E. Lansford]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 11 Change in caregivers attitudes and use of corporal punishment following a legal ban.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.