This paper investigates the performance of different forecasting formulas with fractional Brownian motion based on discrete and finite samples. Existing literature presents two formulas for generating optimal forecasts when continuous records are available. One formula relies on a history over an infinite past, while the other is designed for a record limited to a finite past. In reality, only observations at discrete time points over a finite past are available. In this case, the forecasting formula, which has been widely used in the literature, is the one obtained by Gatheral et al. (Volatility is rough. Quant. Finance, 2018, 18(6), 933–949) that truncates and discretizes the formula based on continuous records over an infinite past. The present paper advocates an alternative forecasting formula, which is the conditional expectation based on finite past discrete-time observations. The findings suggest that the conditional expectation approach produces more accurate forecasts than the existing method, as demonstrated by both simulated data and actual daily realized volatility (RV) observations. Moreover, we also provide empirical evidence showing that the conditional expectation approach can lead to larger economic values than the existing method.