UM
Residential Collegefalse
Status已發表Published
“We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI)
Shen,Ruth Z.Z.1; Xiong,Peng1; Chou,Un I.1; Hall,Brian J.1,2
2019-06-19
Source PublicationComplementary Therapies in Medicine
ISSN18736963 09652299
Volume41Pages:203-207
Abstract

Objective: Although Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) are effective treatments for a variety of psychological problems, the mechanism of treatment effectiveness remains unclear. Qualitative studies of AAI may reveal possible mechanisms. This review aims to synthesize qualitative research and identify factors that might contribute to the effectiveness of AAI. Methods: A literature search of qualitative evidence published before August 8, 2018 was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, ERIC, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and HABRI, with the aim of identifying qualitative research conducted with individuals undergoing AAI. Quality assessment was undertaken by CASP and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using CERQual. Results: A total of 1866 articles were reviewed, and seven were included in the final analysis. A total of six themes were identified as factors relating to the effectiveness of AAI: 1. Fostering feelings of normalcy, 2. Improving behavioral activation, 3. Self-esteem enhancement, 4. Physical contact, belonging, and companionship, 5. Calming and comforting, and 6. Distraction. Barriers to AAI effectiveness were also identified. Conclusion: The results of these studies suggest that AAI was viewed as a positive and highly accepted intervention across populations and settings. AAI might be a useful intervention among people who suffer from a variety of mental disorders. All themes consistently demonstrated that contact with a live animal is more important than the appearance of the animal. Additional investigations of AAI treatment mechanisms are needed.

KeywordAnimal-assisted Interventions Effectiveness Qualitative Systematic Review
DOI10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.001
URLView the original
Language英語English
WOS IDWOS:000453498000030
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85054449454
Fulltext Access
Citation statistics
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionUniversity of Macau
Corresponding AuthorHall,Brian J.
Affiliation1.Global and Community Mental Health Research GroupDepartment of PsychologyUniversity of Macau,Macao,Macao
2.Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDepartment of HealthBehaviorand Society,Baltimore,United States
First Author AffilicationUniversity of Macau
Corresponding Author AffilicationUniversity of Macau
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Shen,Ruth Z.Z.,Xiong,Peng,Chou,Un I.,et al. “We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI)[J]. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2019, 41, 203-207.
APA Shen,Ruth Z.Z.., Xiong,Peng., Chou,Un I.., & Hall,Brian J. (2019). “We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI). Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 41, 203-207.
MLA Shen,Ruth Z.Z.,et al."“We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI)".Complementary Therapies in Medicine 41(2019):203-207.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Shen,Ruth Z.Z.]'s Articles
[Xiong,Peng]'s Articles
[Chou,Un I.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Shen,Ruth Z.Z.]'s Articles
[Xiong,Peng]'s Articles
[Chou,Un I.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Shen,Ruth Z.Z.]'s Articles
[Xiong,Peng]'s Articles
[Chou,Un I.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.