Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Chinese legal traditions: Punitiveness versus mercy | |
Liu, J.1![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
2012 | |
Source Publication | Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice
![]() |
ISSN | 1598-7795 |
Volume | 9Issue:1Pages:17-33 |
Other Abstract | Scholars have often linked differences in punitiveness and legal practices among nations to fundamentally different legal traditions and ways of legal thinking that were fostered differently throughout history. China is often considered to have a long tradition of harsh punishment, mainly due to its greater number of executions of capital punishment compared with other nations. This article argues that the “predominant punitive tradition” in China is an incomplete picture of Chinese legal thinking and practices. Legal thinking and criminal justice practices in China since the fifth century BC were largely influenced by Confucianism and as a result had a feature of mercy that is reflected in modern Chinese legal practices as well. |
Indexed By | 其他Other |
Language | 英語English |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | Faculty of Law DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY |
Corresponding Author | Liu, J. |
Affiliation | 1.University of Macau, Macao SAR, China 2.Southwest University of Political Science and Law, China |
First Author Affilication | University of Macau |
Corresponding Author Affilication | University of Macau |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Liu, J.,Zhao, R.,Xiong, H.,et al. Chinese legal traditions: Punitiveness versus mercy[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 2012, 9(1), 17-33. |
APA | Liu, J.., Zhao, R.., Xiong, H.., & Gong, J. (2012). Chinese legal traditions: Punitiveness versus mercy. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 9(1), 17-33. |
MLA | Liu, J.,et al."Chinese legal traditions: Punitiveness versus mercy".Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice 9.1(2012):17-33. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment