Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder | |
Wang, Yuan Yuan1; Feng, Yuan2; Fang, Meng2; Guo, Chengwei2; Ungvari, Gabor S.3,4; Hall, Brian J.5,6; Wang, Gang2; Xiang, Yu Tao7,8,9 | |
2021-06-22 | |
Source Publication | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
ISSN | 1664-0640 |
Volume | 12Issue:518722 |
Abstract | Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that is often misdiagnosed and under-diagnosed in clinical settings. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed self-administered scale for BD detection, while the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for external rating used by patient's carer (e.g., family member or friend). We aimed to compare the screening abilities between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA, and evaluate the screening consistency between the two scales. Methods: The data were collected from 269 patients with diagnosed BD (n = 84) or major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 185). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) between the HCL-33 and the HCL-33-EA for BD were compared against clinician diagnosis as the gold standard. Results: Using Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value of the HCL-33 is 20, while the corresponding figure for HCL-33-EA is 11. Using Youden's index, the HCL-33-EA showed a better performance than the HCL-33 (0.51 vs.0.41). The HCL-33-EA was more sensitive in correctly identifying BD patients from MDD patients than the HCL-33 (0.83 vs. 0.59), while the HCL-33 presented better specificity than the HCL-33-EA (0.82 vs. 0.68). There was significant screening consistency between the two scales (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both scales have acceptable psychometric properties in detection BD from MDD. Use of the two scales should be considered based on the assessment purpose in clinical research or daily practice (i.e., prefer sensitivity or specificity). Noticeably, the current sample size is insufficient and future studies are recommended to further evaluate the scales. |
Keyword | Bipolar Disorder Hcl-33 Hcl-33-ea Sensitivity Specificity |
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722 |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | SCIE ; SSCI |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Psychiatry |
WOS Subject | Psychiatry |
WOS ID | WOS:000669662100001 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-85109190586 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICINAL ADMINISTRATION Faculty of Health Sciences INSTITUTE OF COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED STUDIES IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES |
Co-First Author | Wang, Yuan Yuan; Feng, Yuan |
Corresponding Author | Wang, Gang; Xiang, Yu Tao |
Affiliation | 1.Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom 2.The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 3.University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia 4.Division of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia/Graylands Hospital, Perth, Australia 5.New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China 6.School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, United States 7.Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao 8.Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao 9.Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao |
Corresponding Author Affilication | Faculty of Health Sciences; University of Macau |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Wang, Yuan Yuan,Feng, Yuan,Fang, Meng,et al. Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder[J]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2021, 12(518722). |
APA | Wang, Yuan Yuan., Feng, Yuan., Fang, Meng., Guo, Chengwei., Ungvari, Gabor S.., Hall, Brian J.., Wang, Gang., & Xiang, Yu Tao (2021). Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(518722). |
MLA | Wang, Yuan Yuan,et al."Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder".Frontiers in Psychiatry 12.518722(2021). |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment