Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Is self-monitoring of blood glucose effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials | |
Zhu H.1; Zhu Y.1; Leung S.-W.2![]() | |
2016-09-01 | |
Source Publication | BMJ Open
![]() |
ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Volume | 6Issue:9 |
Abstract | effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and ClinicalTrials.gov from their respective inception dates to 26 October 2015. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included according to prespecified criteria. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the evidence quality of meta-analyses was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A meta-analysis of primary and secondary outcome measures was performed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were carried out to evaluate the robustness and heterogeneity of the findings. Beggfs and Eggerfs tests were used to quantify publication biases. Results: A total of 15 RCTs, comprising 3383 patients with non-insulin-treated T2D, met the inclusion criteria. The SMBG intervention improved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean difference .0.33; 95% CI .0.45 to .0.22; p=3.0730e.8; n=18), body mass index (BMI; .0.65; .1.18 to .0.12; p=0.0164; n=9) and total cholesterol (TC; .0.12; .0.20 to .0.04; p=0.0034; n=8) more effectively than the control in overall effect. The sensitivity analysis revealed little difference in overall effect, indicating the robustness of the results. SMBG moderated HbA1c levels better than the control in all subgroup analyses. Most of the RCTs had high risk of bias in blinding, while the overall quality of evidence for HbA1c was moderate according to the GRADE criteria. Publication bias was moderate for BMI. Conclusions: SMBG improved HbA1c levels in the short term (.6-month follow-up) and long term (.12-month follow-up) in patients with T2D who were not using insulin. Trial registration number: CRD42015019099. |
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010524 |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | SSCI |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | General & Internal Medicine |
WOS Subject | Medicine, General & Internal |
WOS ID | WOS:000391302900209 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-84985946872 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences |
Affiliation | 1.State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China. 2.State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. |
First Author Affilication | Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Zhu H.,Zhu Y.,Leung S.-W.. Is self-monitoring of blood glucose effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(9). |
APA | Zhu H.., Zhu Y.., & Leung S.-W. (2016). Is self-monitoring of blood glucose effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open, 6(9). |
MLA | Zhu H.,et al."Is self-monitoring of blood glucose effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials".BMJ Open 6.9(2016). |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment