UM  > Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences
Residential Collegefalse
Status已發表Published
Could ginseng-based medicines be better than nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Yongliang Jia1,2; Shikai Zhang1,2; Fangyi Huang3; Siu-wai Leung1,2,4
2012
Source PublicationComplementary Therapies in Medicine
ISSN0965-2299
Volume20Issue:3Pages:155-166
Other Abstract

Background

Ginseng-based medicines and nitrates are commonly used in treating ischemic heart disease (IHD) angina pectoris in China. Hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in Chinese language claimed that ginseng-based medicines can relieve the symptoms of IHD. This study provides the first PRISMA-compliant systematic review with sensitivity and subgroup analyses to evaluate the RCTs comparing the efficacies of ginseng-based medicines and nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease, particularly angina pectoris.

Methods

Past RCTs published up to 2010 on ginseng versus nitrates in treating IHD for 14 or more days were retrieved from major English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, WangFang Data, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. The qualities of included RCTs were assessed with Jadad scale, a refined Jadad scale called M scale, CONSORT 2010 checklist, and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed on the primary outcomes including the improvement of symptoms and electrocardiography (ECG). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed to evaluate the effects of study characteristics of RCTs, including quality, follow-up periods, and efficacy definitions on the overall effect size of ginseng.

Results

Eighteen RCTs with 1549 participants were included. Overall odds ratios for comparing ginseng-based medicines with nitrates were 3.00 (95% CI: 2.27–3.96) in symptom improvement (n = 18) and 1.61 (95% CI: 1.20–2.15) in ECG improvement (n = 10). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression found no significant difference in overall effects among all study characteristics, indicating that the overall effects were stable.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis of 18 eligible RCTs demonstrates moderate evidence that ginseng is more effective than nitrates for treating angina pectoris. However, further RCTs for higher quality, longer follow-up periods, lager sample size, multi-center/country, and are still required to verify the efficacy.

KeywordGinseng Nitrates Ischemic Heart Disease Angina Pectoris Randomized Controlled Trials Meta-analysis Systematic Review
DOI10.1016/j.ctim.2011.12.002
Indexed BySCIE
Language英語English
WOS Research AreaIntegrative & Complementary Medicine
WOS SubjectIntegrative & Complementary Medicine
WOS IDWOS:000303635400007
Scopus ID2-s2.0-84859702971
Fulltext Access
Citation statistics
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionInstitute of Chinese Medical Sciences
Affiliation1.State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine (University of Macau), Taipa, Macao SAR, China
2.School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, United Kingdom
3.Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, The University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China
4.Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, The University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China
First Author AffilicationUniversity of Macau
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Yongliang Jia,Shikai Zhang,Fangyi Huang,et al. Could ginseng-based medicines be better than nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2012, 20(3), 155-166.
APA Yongliang Jia., Shikai Zhang., Fangyi Huang., & Siu-wai Leung (2012). Could ginseng-based medicines be better than nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 20(3), 155-166.
MLA Yongliang Jia,et al."Could ginseng-based medicines be better than nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".Complementary Therapies in Medicine 20.3(2012):155-166.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Yongliang Jia]'s Articles
[Shikai Zhang]'s Articles
[Fangyi Huang]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Yongliang Jia]'s Articles
[Shikai Zhang]'s Articles
[Fangyi Huang]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Yongliang Jia]'s Articles
[Shikai Zhang]'s Articles
[Fangyi Huang]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.