A meta-analysis of 53 papers with 16,522 participants is conducted in the menu-design literature. To conceptualize different design elements, we extend a four-dimensional model by including two new dimensions—menu card label and menu item characteristics. We find that effect sizes vary among these six dimensions. Specifically, menu card characteristics that concern non-descriptive design elements have the largest effect size. The six dimensions are divided into two broad categories that relate to the entire menu or individual menu items. Our meta-analytical results show that the former category yields larger effect than the latter. Concerning the dependent variables, menu design has a large effect on physiological measures, a moderate effect on intention and attitude, and a marginal effect on actual purchase. Furthermore, laboratory studies yield larger effects than field studies do, and mock menus have stronger effect than real menus. Lastly, publication bias seems to be moderate.